Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:50

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Your TRICARE Checklist for Moving - TRICARE Newsroom (.mil)
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Texas woman dies from brain-eating amoeba after using tap water for nasal rinse - Scripps News
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Anger as Kanye West to perform in Slovakia after Hitler song - France 24
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why do I sweat (mostly on face) when I eat usually spicy food?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How humpback whales are playfully communicating with humans, according to scientists - ABC News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Origami structures unfold into seamless surfaces for deployable applications - Phys.org